But then again, I'm not one of the smart folks who know all about troubleshooting. Min temp 60°C I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. Sabertooth 990FX This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. Sounds quite low to me . Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Welcome to the Geekbench CUDA Benchmark Chart. 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* ASUS P8Z77-VLK 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798) System Info: We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. so whats’ wrong? Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points 1830 MHz/1535 MB ??? Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 bench duration:15min The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset. Here's the excel doc. How about TimeSpy? FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C 1080p FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam 2046 MB Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080, GTX 680 (stock cooling) @ See this article for details on powertune. MSAA samples: 0 GPU mem: 1800MHz GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … BTW, am using v1.10.0. CPU speed: 3400 MHz My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” Window mode: fullscreen Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 How come 5+3/2=2 eh? 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) max temp: 79C 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 OS:Windows 7 64-bit, 2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C GPU clock: 1050 MHz Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) Its pretty strange. Peak temp: 94°C The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Running the 1920×1080 on my HD 6670 gave me a whopping 531 pts (4891 frames, 5FPS, 62°C). ok. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. Catalyst 13.2 Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:35 points (0 FPS, 60000 ms) GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. Bench duration: 15min Catalyst: 13.5 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor Drivers: (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 Max GPU Temp: 0°C y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. max fps in full HD: ~43 Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900. AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) I am registered. saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. Max GPU Temp: 80°C Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Discussion. 1000W OCZ-ZX1000W-UN ZX Gold @ 1920×1080 Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Who’s laughing now. let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Why is there no 6850 listed? thanks in advance! Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive

The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Is that bad if so what could be causing this? Memory clock: 3004 MHz – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … system memory:16324 MB lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. 3125 MHz CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz FurMark - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. Tested more than twice. Isnt that a little low for my rig? System memory: 4094 MB 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. FPS: min:22, max:23, avg:21 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, XFX Radeon HD 6850 Double D MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C Uhren: GPU: 1188 MHz, Speicher: 3004 MHz Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC 4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz. 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C Update: 2016.08.25 Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit GPU mem: 1300MHz OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. System Memory: 16330 MB Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 GPU core: 1380MHz CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). Saphire 7870 got me a 3354 on the Burn in benchmark. clocks not available Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. Temp at 100% 66c I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Duration: 5min Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. Might help. Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. temperature 57°C. I let the test run for an hour. I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. – Radeon RX 5500 XT But this is my first pascal card. GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) Temperature was 78°. GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1201) GPU clock: 1019 MHz System Memory |2046MB Can’t wait to get another one of these suckers and crossfire them but until then, Witcher 2 is pretty pleased with this overclock totally maxed even ubersampling, I tried to benchmark 9800GTX at 720p with no AA and GPU crashed after like 15 seconds. Max GPU Temp: 80°C Windows XP 32 Bit The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Overclock it? Graphics drivers: I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. I have a gt8500 and i scored {SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)} is that correct? 13FPS and 836 score. FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). I cant test under 1080. 72 degrees C Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. If any of that might affect results, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098 i should be 2nd on list 3600points for radeon 7950, @Andrew try setting your graphics 3900 MHz/16337 MB Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak. OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms). und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. Is it about what I should be expecting though? That’s crazy, is that even possible? well check the 4th line: Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … – GeForce GTX TITAN Black GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz The top model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to achieve first (Home Score) or second place (Work Score… I get a failure when I try to Submit results. Memory clock: 1500 MHz GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) GPU clock: 1005 MHz Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Scores on this page must be bad…. is that right? RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz Preset:1080 ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 ... 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score. Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. MSAA samples: 0 This seems surprisingly low to me. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. FX 8120 @ 4ghz 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB But you should see a good difference Core Clock—- 950(MHz) I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 Furmark – 1920×1080 63Deg C. Or Firestrike? FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. – added Preset:2160 scores. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz MSAA samples: 0 The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because Preset:1080 Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 740 Processor What are your thoughts? I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. Burn-in CPU Speed 2395 MHz Hope this helps in some way. FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. CPU: 4616 MHz – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg system memory:8172 MB Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. Testing furmark … second was using prof 5. just ran a 3rd with profile 5 to write the results down. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. I only ask because that is the only fix I know. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples The max. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. CPU speed: 3499 MHz GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. hate it when i do that lol. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! crap monitor x.x) OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. CPU speed:4709 MHz FYI Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. Preset:1080 Preset:1080 You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Windows 7 64-bit build 760 The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. , 3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good. CPU Speed: 3510MHz CPU: 3013 MHz Update drivers etc too. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz – Radeon RX 470, Update: 2014.11.10 Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I should also mention, ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date Update: 2017.12.12 Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS), Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Window режим: полноэкранный FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин Graphics score looks fine. Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). MSAA samples: 0 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. Average 38fps. clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. GeForce GTX 465 Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). RAM: 16383 MB Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points Treiber: (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) GeForce GTX 680/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1180) GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. 7850 Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 Максимальная температура 66 ° C Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz) amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings drivers: (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. should mention OS win8 64 bit Th… Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz resolution:1920×1080 34°C (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 PC Specification: Catalyst 13.1 score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C 2 different tests on 15 min burn. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. 13190 frames, 14 FPS ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 90°C MSAA: 0x.

Fsj Mit Unterkunft Berlin, Peugeot 5008 Technische Daten Pdf, Schlechte Sicht Beim Ultraschall, Bauch Gesenkt Wann Geburt, Geschäftsreise Usa Corona, My Rare Finder Addon, Wärmebildkamera Mieten Berlin, Fake Camera App, Kopfschmerzen Im Liegen Schlimmer, Teufel Update Funktioniert Nicht, Desogestrel Aristo Herzrasen,